GRECO Report on Corruption in Ireland

Elaine Byrne 21/11/14

The Council of Europe (GRECO) today published it’s fourth evaluation round report on corruption in Ireland. Corruption prevention in respect of members of parliament, judges and prosecutors  contains eleven recommendations.

The recommendations are a timely intervention into the debate on political reform – much of which campaigners for reform have been advocating for some time. No surprises here – the strong focus on judges pay is interesting though. Much of it is echoes the European Commission report on corruption in Ireland published earlier this year.



1. The existing ethics framework be replaced with a uniform and consolidated values-based normative framework encompassing the ethical conduct of members of parliament – including their staff as appropriate – covering various situations of conflicts of interest (gifts and other advantages, third party contacts including lobbyists, accessory activities and post-employment situations etc.) with the aim of providing clear rules concerning their expected conduct;

2. Authorities clarify the scope of the Houses of the Oireachtas (Inquiries, Privileges and Procedures) Act 2013 so as to ensure that
the protections and encouragement for whistleblowers contained in the Protected Disclosures Act 2014 are fully understood and

3. Existing regime on asset declarations be enhanced by i) extending the obligations upon all members of parliament to disclose their interests to include quantitative data on their significant financial and economic involvements as well as in respect of significant liabilities; and ii) that consideration be given to widening the scope of members’ declarations to also include close or connected persons, in line with the existing rules for office holders;

4. Establishment of a consolidated independent monitoring mechanism be considered in respect of members of parliament, that it
be provided with necessary means to investigate complaints as well as to sanction findings of misconduct and that all its decisions, including on the dismissal of cases are given an appropriate level of publicity;

5. Parliamentary authorities provide dedicated regular training for members of parliament on issues such as ethics, conduct in
situations of conflicts of interests and corruption prevention;


6. With due expedition, an independent statutory council be established for the judiciary, provided with adequate resources and
funding for its organisation and operations;

7. The current system for selection, recruitment, promotion and transfers of judges be reviewed with a view to target the
appointments to the most qualified and suitable candidates in a transparent way, without improper influence from the
executive/political powers;

8. Appropriate structure be established within the framework of which questions concerning constitutional safeguards of the judiciary in connection with employment conditions are to be examined – in close dialogue with judicial representatives – with a view to maintaining the high levels of judicial integrity and professional quality in the future;

9. Code of conduct for judges be formally established, including guidance and confidential counselling in respect of conflicts of interest and other integrity related matters (gifts, recusal, third party contacts and handling of confidential information etc.) and ii) connect such an instrument to an accountability mechanism;

10. Dedicated induction and in-service training for judges be institutionalised and adequately resourced, while respecting the
independence of the judiciary;


11.  Policy for handling complaints against the Prosecution Service be enhanced with a view to i) establishing more independent
processing of matters concerning the integrity and ethical conduct of prosecutors and ii) further developing the statistics concerning such complaints.




3 thoughts on “GRECO Report on Corruption in Ireland

  1. In the week that the Government performed the final series of U-turns on the implementation of a water sector policy enabled by legislation that it had rammed through the Oireachtas with minimal scutiny Sections 24 to 36 on the ‘Transparency of the Legislative Process’ make for hilarious reading. The conclusion is that “It would appear that Ireland is well advanced in using modern
    communication techniques in this respect in order to connect the legislative processes
    with the wider public.” Tell that to the 100,000+ citizens who took to the streets (and the likely many more who supported and approved their protests) to express thier views on their connectivity with the legislative processes. Given their abiding commitment to the democratic process and their usual approach of forming a settled opinion on those who govern and of biding their time quietly and patiently until they can cast their judgement at the polling booths, this mass protest is unprecedented. And it has taken particular genius on the part of the Government to provoke it.

    The Government and the influential special interest groups to which it panders are worried. And so they should be. More and more people are beginning to realise how the antics of these special interest groups are imposing unjustified costs on them that leave them struggling with their household bills. But instead of stopping the spinning of the webs of lies, half-truths and fictions to cover up support for these antics (with which most voters are fed up to the back teeth) and engaging directly and honestly with voters, all we’re getting are some concessions (bribing people with their own money), the threat of repression and the demonisation of protest (with some of the populists and left-wing headbangers conveniently filling the roles of pantomime villains).

    This report appears to be deeply concerned about the ethics of elected public representatives when there is compelling evidence that they are total and absolute failures at what they’re elected to do. It is simply worthless.

    • I accept that I may have been a bit harsh in describing this report as ‘worthless’. The effort is obviously crammed with good intentions. It’s simply that I would be prepared to tolerate some public representatives whose grasp of ethics might be a little shaky if all public representatives were doing what they’re elected to do. That is the real problem; they’re not doing what they’re elected to do. An excessive focus on ethics runs the risk of generating identikit, assembly-line plastic politicians who are easily suborned by special interest groups. The perfect example is the well-heeled, Oxbridge-educated UK Labour politicians who disingenuously ptetend to attack the special interests groups damaging the interests of ordinary citizens while simultaneously kow-towing to them and who sneer at those whose interests they should be seeking to represent.

  2. Pingback: ICTU-HOW IT CONTINUES TO FAIL US! | Paddy Healy's Blog

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s